Module 2: Assignment 2--Change Theory

  • Due Jul 15, 2023 at 11:59pm
  • Points 100
This assignment is part of the module Module 2: Managing and Improving Quality and hasn't been unlocked yet.

Completion Prerequisites

The following requirements need to be completed before this page will be unlocked:

    Rubric

    Find Rubric
    Keep in mind that 170 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
    Assignment: Change Theories Project (1)
    Assignment: Change Theories Project (1)
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    Introduction
    threshold: pts
    8 to >6.0 pts
    Target
    Target: Clear statement of a scenario (problem) and proposed change and rationale Clear statement of change theory model to be employed
    6 to >0.0 pts
    Acceptable
    Statement of a proposed change Statement of theory model addressed
    0 pts
    Unacceptable
    No statement of a proposed change No statement of theory model Not an approved topic (Refer to module 1 for a list of approved topics) 5 points if no note section NO POINTS FOR NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC
    pts
    8 pts
    --
    SWOT Analysis
    threshold: pts
    12 to >10.0 pts
    Target
    Clear identification of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats associated with implementing or failing to implement the proposed plan
    10 to >8.0 pts
    Acceptable
    Description of some potential strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats associated proposed plan
    8 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Missing description of viable strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats associated with proposed plan Not an approved topic (Refer to module 1 for a list of approved topics) 8 points if no note section NO POINTS FOR NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC
    pts
    12 pts
    --
    Action Plan
    threshold: pts
    40 to >32.0 pts
    Target
    Each of these components addressed in detail • Change Theory Model • Steps and processes • Communication plan • Leadership styles • Management functions • Budget requirements/ implications • Steps to assure staff compliance • Evaluation Formatted correctly as PowerPoint slideshow for stakeholders with script in Notes sections
    32 to >16.0 pts
    Acceptable
    Each of these components addressed generally (See list under “Target”) PowerPoint slideshow for some audience and script in some slides
    16 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Some components addressed minimally or not at all PowerPoint slideshow not written as a script and/or not recorded in the Notes sections (0-5 pts) Not an approved topic (Refer to module 1 for a list of approved topics) NO POINTS FOR NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC 17 points if no note section
    pts
    40 pts
    --
    Decision-Making Process
    threshold: pts
    15 to >14.0 pts
    Target
    Analysis of the decision-making process used by the group, including effective/ineffective processes and what you would change in the future
    14 to >9.0 pts
    Acceptable
    General analysis of the decision-making process used by the group, including effective/ineffective processes or what you would you change in the future
    9 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Some components addressed minimally or not at all PowerPoint slideshows not written as a script and/or not recorded in the Notes sections (0-5 pts) Not an approved topic 0 points (Refer to module 1 for a list of approved topics) NO POINTS FOR NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC 5 points if no note section
    pts
    15 pts
    --
    References
    threshold: pts
    15 to >14.0 pts
    Target
    At least 3 references to professional literature, with correct APA citations
    14 to >6.0 pts
    Acceptable
    At least 2 references to professional literature, with mostly correct APA citations
    6 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    6 to >0 pts Unacceptable One reference to professional literature, with correct APA citation - Not an approved topic (Refer to module 1 for a list of approved topics) 5 points if no note section NO POINTS FOR NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC
    pts
    15 pts
    --
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAttractive
    threshold: pts
    10 to >5.0 pts
    Full Marks
    Professional, appropriate appearance with no spelling or grammar errors; designed with appropriate use of color, graphics, and fonts. Up to 5 points will be deducted if images, pictures, graphics, direct quotes used are not cited.
    5 to >0 pts
    No Marks
    Design or grammar/spelling errors prohibit reading or understanding content and if images used are not cited. The content is unorganized and lacks professionalism. NO points for not an approved topic - may get all 10 points if slides are attractive even if no note section.
    pts
    10 pts
    --
    Total Points: 100 out of 100